**Next message:**Vladyslav Shtabovenko: "Re: Context-Sensitive Input Assistant Slow Down"**Previous message:**Peter: "Re: Question: minor bug in definitions for AntiCommutator and Commutator ?"**In reply to:**Vladyslav Shtabovenko: "Re: OneLoop gets different results with/without OneLoopSimplify"**Messages sorted by:**[ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]**Mail actions:**[ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

*> If you are curious, you can also see the explicit cancellation using
*

*> the new option "UsePaVeBasis" in TID, which makes TID return output in
*

*> terms of PaVe coefficient functions (well, some pieces are still FAD's,
*

*> but I'll improve on that soon)
*

OK, with the new ToPaVe function

<https://github.com/FeynCalc/feyncalc/commit/b451fac89e4aa990d6dff248e13a3890dd832f76>

we can finally convert scalar integrals written as FAD[...] to PaVe

functions without using OneLoop:

ToPaVe[FAD[{q, m}, {q + p, m2}], q]

-> I*Pi^2*B0[Pair[Momentum[p, D], Momentum[p, D]], m^2, m2^2]

This way we can obtain an output purely in terms of PaVe functions

without OneLoop.

Thanks again to Manuel for his mail. In this case ToPaVe turns out to be

quite useful:

<< FeynCalc`

ClearScalarProducts;

bb = xx;

ScalarProduct[bb, p1] = 0; ScalarProduct[bb, bb] = 0;

ScalarProduct[p1, p1] = m^2; ScalarProduct[p2, p2] = m^2;

ScalarProduct[p1, r] = 0; ScalarProduct[bb, r] = 0;

ScalarProduct[bb, p2] = 0; ScalarProduct[r, p2] = 1;

ScalarProduct[p1, p2] = 0;

amp = SPD[r, z] SPD[bb, z] SPD[p2, z] SPD[p1,

z] FAD[{z, 0}, {p1 + bb - z, m}, {p2 - z, m}, {p1 - z, m}];

int = TID[amp, z]

int

% // ExpandScalarProduct // Simplify

% // ToPaVe[#, z] &

As of now you have to invoke ToPaVe by hand, but I'm planning to

integrate it into TID in a clever way, in particular to detect integrals

that look different but actually evaluate to same value as in the above

example.

Cheers,

Vladyslav

*>
*

*>
*

*> Am 06.05.2015 um 14:38 schrieb manuel J.Vicente:
*

*>> Dear Vladyslav,
*

*>> thanks for your prompt answer. I've also found another problem with OneLoop. It fails in the 8.2.0 and in today's nightly version. Results from default options and OneLoopSimplify->True differ.
*

*>>
*

*>> Notice the first line: bb=k. It corresponds to an external momentum. Changing its name to anything alphabetically after p (e.g. bb=x) seems to solve the problem??
*

*>>
*

*>> ===================================================================
*

*>> << FeynCalc`
*

*>> bb = k;
*

*>> ScalarProduct[bb, p1] = 0; ScalarProduct[bb, bb] = 0;
*

*>> ScalarProduct[p1, p1] = m^2; ScalarProduct[p2, p2] = m^2;
*

*>> ScalarProduct[p1, r] = 0; ScalarProduct[bb, r] = 0;
*

*>> ScalarProduct[bb, p2] = 0; ScalarProduct[r, p2] = 1;
*

*>> ScalarProduct[p1, p2] = 0;
*

*>>
*

*>> amp = SPD[r, z] SPD[bb, z] SPD[p2, z] SPD[p1,
*

*>> z] FAD[{z, 0}, {p1 + bb - z, m}, {p2 - z, m}, {p1 - z, m}];
*

*>>
*

*>> FI; OneLoop[z, amp] // PaVeReduce
*

*>>
*

*>> (-I/24)*m^2*Pi^2
*

*>>
*

*>> OneLoop[z, amp, OneLoopSimplify -> True]
*

*>>
*

*>> 0
*

*>> ======================================
*

*>>
*

*>> best regards and thanks again!
*

*>>
*

*>> M.J. Vicente
*

*>>
*

**Next message:**Vladyslav Shtabovenko: "Re: Context-Sensitive Input Assistant Slow Down"**Previous message:**Peter: "Re: Question: minor bug in definitions for AntiCommutator and Commutator ?"**In reply to:**Vladyslav Shtabovenko: "Re: OneLoop gets different results with/without OneLoopSimplify"**Messages sorted by:**[ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]**Mail actions:**[ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29
: 08/17/17-03:40:02 PM Z CEST
*