**Next message:**Camm Maguire: "Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: FeynCalc -> MAXIMA"**Previous message:**Camm Maguire: "Re: [Maxima] Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: FeynCalc -> MAXIMA"**In reply to:**Bob McElrath: "Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: FeynCalc -> MAXIMA"**Next in thread:**Bob McElrath: "Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: FeynCalc -> MAXIMA"**Reply:**Bob McElrath: "Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: FeynCalc -> MAXIMA"**Messages sorted by:**[ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]**Mail actions:**[ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Greetings!

Bob McElrath <bob+maxima@mcelrath.org> writes:

*> Bertfried Fauser [fauser@spock.physik.uni-konstanz.de] wrote:
*

*> >
*

*> > Hi,
*

*> >
*

*> > as fare as I understand the package (havn't though done much with it, so I
*

*> > might be wrong), it is designed for very "practical" purpose (ie
*

*> > phenomenology.) Many problems can be subsummarized in a larger frame of
*

*> > mathematics. Given the type system of AXIOM, it would be, in my eyes, a
*

*> > fraud to implement something like "Dirac matrixes" and trace rules, while
*

*> > this is a closed structure in a *-autonomous category. However, I am still
*

*> > not able myself to give AXIOM code for such a vast general thing.
*

*>
*

*> The *purpose* of FeynCalc is to be a general purpose framework for doing
*

*> quantum field theory calculations. That is, dirac matrices, trace
*

*> rules, Feynman rules from Lagrangians, representations for fields and
*

*> the like.
*

*>
*

*> It also contains code for doing one-loop integrals. This same code
*

*> exists in several places (I know of a fortan library "ff" and a Maple
*

*> package "xloops" as well), and I can point to the papers if people
*

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I think this would be helpful.

Take care,

*> desire. But the loop code is only half of FeynCalc.
*

*>
*

*> The actual algorithms are straightforward, but very tedious to
*

*> calculate, so thus the results are collected into libraries like
*

*> FeynCalc. There are yet a handful of obstacles in dealing with
*

*> divergences that have kept us from writing a fully automatic method of
*

*> computing these loop integrals. At one loop I think it can be fully
*

*> automatic, but I do not think this is something a non-expert would want
*

*> to tackle.
*

*>
*

*> The "algorithms" are documented in QFT textbooks such as Peskin &
*

*> Schroeder "An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory", Weinberg "Quantum
*

*> Theory of Fields", etc. This is a one-year graduate level physics
*

*> course. The decomposition of loop integrals into scalar integrals was
*

*> done by Passarino and Veltman
*

*> http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(79)90234-7
*

*> though these days it's not the only way...
*

*>
*

*> Cheers,
*

*> Bob McElrath [Univ. of California at Davis, Department of Physics]
*

*>
*

*> "A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely
*

*> rearranging their prejudices." -- William James
*

*>
*

-- Camm Maguire camm@enhanced.com ========================================================================== "The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah

**Next message:**Camm Maguire: "Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: FeynCalc -> MAXIMA"**Previous message:**Camm Maguire: "Re: [Maxima] Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: FeynCalc -> MAXIMA"**In reply to:**Bob McElrath: "Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: FeynCalc -> MAXIMA"**Next in thread:**Bob McElrath: "Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: FeynCalc -> MAXIMA"**Reply:**Bob McElrath: "Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: FeynCalc -> MAXIMA"**Messages sorted by:**[ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]**Mail actions:**[ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29
: 10/19/17-10:40:01 AM Z CEST
*